Accreditation is a quality assurance process that assesses whether an educational institution or training program meets certain quality standards. Accreditation serves as a “seal of approval” for a higher education institution or training program, demonstrating that it has met or exceeded certain standards of educational quality.
Issues Raised Around “Post-Inspection”
In recent times, accreditation and quality assurance in our higher education has achieved a lot in terms of issuing standards, legal framework, training and retraining of accredited persons, and has managed to establish many centers for accreditation of quality education.
The visible results are that many higher education institutions have met accreditation standards and hundreds of programs have been accredited, qualified and awarded accreditation certificates.
The outcome of the quality assurance verification process is recognition from the quality accreditation organization. However, if we look at the implications behind the results from hundreds of higher education institutions and hundreds of accredited training programs, it appears that these results have not been well received by higher education institutions. As the community cares about the quality assurance process to be more and more complete and there are changes in the accreditation policy.
The problems posed by post-accreditation can be considered as a consequence of the impact on the school’s work. as students, teachers and community satisfaction; willingness to pay higher tuition for the “good money” spent by students; Indicators such as an increase or decrease in the employability rate of students 6 months after graduation compared to pre-accreditation, or two to three years after obtaining quality accreditation; Has enrollment size increased and survival and dropout rates decreased?
Are quality culture issues present throughout the school? Has speaker income and employer satisfaction increased or not? If it is the result of an impact, it is necessary to evaluate the number of institutions that arrive at the university to form partners in scientific research and training. In particular, after inspection, will the recurring expenses and capital construction investment increase or decrease?
An objective assessment of these effects will help the school to see the real meaning and effectiveness of accreditation… Particularly useful for accreditation policy makers to continuously improve quality and strengthen the team of experts and expertise of accreditation organizations.
According to world experience, there are very few influences behind the adoption of accreditation, which can be listed below:
After accreditation, the quality of education is enhanced by meeting rigorous educational accreditation standards, while encouraging continual improvement in teaching, research, and other areas.
Increased Student Satisfaction: Students can feel confident that they are receiving a high-quality education from an accredited institution or program.
After the test, the improved employment rate will affect the reputation and reputation of the higher education institution and therefore affect the ability to compete for more jobs in the labor market.
In addition to accreditation credibility to ensure the real value of each training accreditation in the accreditation and transfer process. Accreditation will facilitate the recognition and transfer of credits between higher education institutions when students wish to change courses or change schools.
Graduates of an objectively and reliably accredited program will be an important factor in licensing some professions, as some organizations require graduates to obtain certification from a training program or institution that is recognized for meeting quality standards.
The impact of accreditation results will affect public confidence in the accredited degree, which will affect the reputation, funding and social contribution of that institution or training sector.
When an accredited higher education institution or training program is accredited, it means that it has met or exceeded certain standards of quality and rigor established by an external accreditation body. This provides a degree of assurance to the community that the university or program provides a high-quality education and that its graduates are well prepared for the careers of their choice.
In addition, educational institutions/institutions often need to be accredited to receive government funding, which can increase public confidence in the institution/institution. For example, in the United States, programs must be approved to participate in federal financial aid packages – such as the Pell Grant and Stafford Loan programs (a form of student financial aid). This means that students who attend accredited schools are more likely to receive financial aid, which builds community trust in those schools.
Thus, educational accreditation increases the reputation and credibility of the institution/institution, making it a more attractive workplace for teachers. Accreditation can also increase public support and funding, which can allow the institution/institution to offer better working conditions to faculty.
Institutions/accredited institutions are generally more reputable and reputable, which makes them more attractive to senior faculty candidates. Accreditation can also ensure the ability to attract teaching talent through its commitment to providing high quality education and prioritizing continuous improvement of opportunities to increase international collaboration in research and training.
In general, the ability to attract and retain outstanding faculty is an important factor in a university’s success, and accreditation can be an important tool in achieving this effect. By enhancing an institution’s reputation and credibility, accreditation can increase a university’s attractiveness to top academic talent, which in turn can lead to better educational outcomes and quality for students.
How Is The Impact Of Test Results Measured?
An overview of QA impact results and how to monitor and evaluate these impact results is also provided. Usually to monitor and evaluate people design indicators.
Specifically, in terms of quality, there should be indicators of student performance, dropout rate, graduation rate, and graduate employment rate; In addition, there are issues related to surveys and assessments carried out by reputable organizations.
Financial indicators include: social or government funding and availability of resources for teachers and students. An important indicator is the quality of the faculty through data on highly qualified professors, the proportion of professors involved in research and the quality of research products such as academic publications or academic publications and social service products.
In addition, it is necessary to carry out a survey with professors, alumni and employers to assess stakeholder satisfaction.
The phenomenon of some higher education institutions, after obtaining the accreditation certificate, is self-satisfaction and does not have a strategy or plan for continuous quality improvement. Therefore, there is a need for an indicator of the level of continuous quality improvement through self-assessment activities and planning and implementation of quality improvement activities that meet the requirements and recommendations of quality accreditation bodies.
It is important to note that specific indicators and metrics are used to assess the impact of accreditation results, and this will help the higher education institution to become aware of the results and their implications. improve the quality.
